Legal Opinion

Donnell-Zane Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 6, 1932No. H-403PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

The plaintiff on May 4, 1922, entered into a contract with the Quartermaster Corps, United States Army, to take down and reerect four steel hangars complete with roller steel doors and to erect eight additional steel doors with connections and foundations at Mitchel Field, Mineóla, Long Island, New York.

The case was referred to a commissioner of the court to take the proofs and report the facts. Neither of the parties having filed exceptions to the report of the commissioner, his report is approved and adopted as the special findings of fact in the case.

By the terms of the contract the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCloskey ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. Goldstone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  3. Detroit Steel Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Litchfield Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  4. Hirsch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  5. Litchfield Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API