Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 3, 1941No. 42997PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittuetoN, Judge

The primary questions involved in plaintiff’s claims for damages for delay, extra costs, and unpaid portions of the contract prices under the four contracts in this case are essentially questions of fact. The principles of law applicable to the facts as established by the record are fairly well settled. The voluminous record which details all the facts and circumstances concerning the performance by both parties of the wort required of them under the three contracts, extending from Evansville, Indiana, to Atlanta, Georgia, and the contract on the Indianapolis-Chicago section of the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Crozier v. Fried. Krupp AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. New York Shipbuilding Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Fehlhaber Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  5. A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API