Legal Opinion

Detroit Steel Products Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 13, 1926No. D-787PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

The plaintiff entered into a contract with the Government to furnish all necessary labor and materials for and to install certain steel sash and incidentals in four designated buildings in accordance with specifications made a part of the contract. The contract was dated the 14th day of September, 1919, and related to buildings then in course of construe*694tion by other contractors. The sash could not be installed until the buildings were ready for it. There was much delay, and not until the fall of 1922 was plaintiif’s work completed. To what extent the Government should be held responsible for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. H. E. Crook Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. MuellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. United States v. BarlowSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  2. Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. Ross Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  4. Donnell-Zane Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API