Legal Opinion

Vance v. Kassab

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1974No. 23 C. D. 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The plaintiffs, Charles D. Vance and Patricia H. Vance, Ms wife, seek our order restraining the Secretary of the Department of Transportation and H. J. Williams Company, a road builder, from constructing a pipe to drain water from a township road. The defendants have filed preliminary objections in the nature of demurrers raising the Commonwealth’s and the Secretary’s constitutional immunity from suit.

A demurrer, of course, admits as true all facts which are well and clearly pleaded, but not the pleader’s conclusions or statements of law. Commonwealth’s Crosstown…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth's Crosstown Expressway AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Valley Forge Golf Club v. Upper Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Conrad v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. KassabCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Lindsley v. RobinsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Lutzko v. Mikris, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Gast v. State, by and Through StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Robinson v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Fulmer v. White Oak BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API