Legal Opinion
Robinson v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 29, 1977No. 230 Misc. DocketPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
To a petition for review by petitioner pro se, Ernest Robinson, respondents have filed a preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer. Such a preliminary objection admits as true all well and clearly pleaded material factual averments and all inferences fairly deducible therefrom. Yania v. Bigan, 397 Pa. 316, 155 A.2d 343 (1959); Mistick v. Cammack, 397 Pa. 296, 154 A.2d 588 (1959); Vance v. Kassab, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 328, 325 A.2d 924 (1974). Conclusions of law and unjustified inferences are not so admitted. Lerman v. Rudolph, 413 Pa. 555, 198 A.2d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- LERAMAN v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Close v. VoorheesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- McClure v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Jacobs v. RobinsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Sinwell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Forbes v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.