Legal Opinion

Smith v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1994No. 9324SC719PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCRODDEN, Judge.

At the outset we note that appeals from denial of motions for summary judgment, such as the instant one, are interlocutory and typically not allowed because they do not affect a substantial right of the parties. Waters v. Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 208, 240 S.E.2d 338, 343 (1978). However, when the motion is made on the grounds of sovereign and qualified immunity, such a denial is immediately appeal-able, because to force a defendant to proceed with a trial from which he should be immune would vitiate the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Corum v. University of North…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Efird v. RileyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  2. Boyd v. Robeson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Ramírez Salcedo v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
  4. Russ v. CauseyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
  5. Baker v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API