Legal Opinion
Ambrose v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Virginia, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 27, 1995No. Civ. A. 3:94cv636PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
The Amended Class Action Complaint (“Amended Complaint”) contains five counts. In Counts One and Two, Richard G. Bird, and the class he purports to represent, assert claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (“ERISA”). These two counts have been voluntarily dismissed. Consequently, Bird is no longer a plaintiff and there are no ERISA claims remaining. Count Three is asserted by Nancy L. Am-brose and Habib Guirguis, and the classes they purport to represent, under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- American Chiropractic Ass'n v. Trigon Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Bancoklahoma Mortgage Corp. v. Capital Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Barbara Kenty v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A., and Transamerica Premier Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Doe v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.