Legal Opinion

Panzino v. Continental Can Company

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 29, 1976PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mountain, J.

Petitioner filed a claim for occupational hearing loss six years after retiring from his employment with respondent corporation. As the Workmen’s Compensation Act was then written, this time span exceeded the permissible period within which such a claim was required to be filed. Two months before his claim was heard, however, a statutory amendment abrogated the time limitation. The issue before us is whether the amendment applies and thus saves petitioner’s claim.

It was stipulated that petitioner, Louis Panzino, retired from respondent’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1951

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Pizzullo v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Twiss v. State, Dept. of TreasurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API