Legal Opinion

Akef v. BASF Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1995PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the issue of whether an employee’s material misrepresentation of a preexisting medical condition bars a claim for worker’s compensation. The Judge of Compensation found that the reliance by the employer on the employee’s purposeful and knowing misrepresentation bars the employee from seeking a worker’s compensation award for an occupational disease that was the subject of such misrepresentations. The Appellate Division, in a reported decision by Judge Dreier, reversed. 275 N.J.Super. 30, 645 A.2d 158 (1994).

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fiore v. Consolidated FreightwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Squeo v. Comfort Control Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Bond v. Rose Ribbon & Carbon Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. Giagnacovo v. Beggs Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Gulick v. HM Enoch, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Laidlow v. Hariton MacH. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Wilson v. Wal-Mart StoresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Flor v. HolguinHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Freeman v. RothrockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Williams v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API