Legal Opinion
Ruggles v. Keebler Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 15, 2002No. CIV.A.00-2481-GTVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VANBEBBER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Marc Ruggles brings this case alleging that his employer, Defendant Kee-bler Company, discriminated against him because of his actual or perceived disability, violating the Americans with Disabili ties Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. and the Kansas Act Against Discrimination (“KAAD”), K.S.A. § 44-1111 et seq. He further alleges that Defendant discriminated against him because of his age, violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. and the KAAD. Finally, Plaintiff alleges that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davis v. City of GrapevineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Berry v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Nuzum v. Ozark Automotive Distributors, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004
- Engle v. Royal Bahamain Association, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
- James B. Davis AND City of Grapevine v. City of Grapevine AND James B. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.