Legal Opinion
Berry v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 27, 2007No. 05-1533PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
After T-Mobile USA, Inc. (T-Mobile) terminated Barbara Berry’s employment, she filed an action claiming the termination violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (sex discrimination), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621. She also alleged breach of implied contract and promissory estoppel. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of T-Mobile concluding Berry was an “at-will” employee. The court also determined: (1) Berry was not “disabled”…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Morgan v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Smothers v. Solvay Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- DePaula v. Easter Seals El MiradorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Carter v. PATHFINDER ENERGY SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Ramos-Echevarria v. Pichis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Lobato v. New Mexico Environment DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.