Legal Opinion
New York Shipping Ass'n v. Federal Maritime Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 9, 1988No. Nos. 82-1347, 87-1370PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
These two petitions for review require us to revisit the legal imbroglios arising from a collective bargaining agreement between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and ocean common carriers, known as the Rules on Containers. The Rules implement, in ports along the Eastern Seaboard and the Gulf of Mexico, a technological innovation in the ocean shipping industry referred to as “containerization.” The Supreme Court has held that the Rules are a valid work preservation agreement under the federal labor laws, in a case where the “difficult and complex…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Martini v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- The Business Roundtable v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Daniel J. Walsh D/B/A Liberation Graphics v. Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Exportal Ltda., Mario Fantuzzi, and Jesus Villasante v. United States of America and Clayton Yeutter, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern California Gas Company, Mobil Oil Corporation, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Kern River Gas Transmission Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Texaco, Inc., United States Borax and Chemical Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Mojave Pipeline Company, the Process Gas Consumers Group, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Wyoming Natural Gas Pipeline Authority, Amoco Production Company, El Paso Municipal Customer Group, Southern Union Gas Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, Intervenors. Mojave Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Kern River Gas Transmission Company, United States Borax and Chemical Corporation, Southern California Gas Company, Mobil Oil Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Amoco Production Company, Southern Union Gas Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, the Southern California Utility Power Pool, the Process Gas Consumers Group, Intervenors. Kern River Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern California Gas Company, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Mojave Pipeline Company, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Amoco Production Company, Southern Union Gas Company, United States Borax and Chemical Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Southwest Gas Corporation, Southern California Utility Power Pool, Texaco, Inc., El Paso Natural Gas Company, Intervenors. Kern River Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Southern Union Gas Company, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern California Gas Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Utility Power Pool, Mojave Pipeline Company, Intervenors. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southwest Gas Corporation, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Gas Company, Kern River Gas Transmission Company, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern Union Gas Company, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., New Mexico Department of Energy, Mineral & Natural Resources, the Process Gas Consumers Group, Mojave Pipeline Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.