Legal Opinion

Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern California Gas Company, Mobil Oil Corporation, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Kern River Gas Transmission Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Texaco, Inc., United States Borax and Chemical Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Mojave Pipeline Company, the Process Gas Consumers Group, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Wyoming Natural Gas Pipeline Authority, Amoco Production Company, El Paso Municipal Customer Group, Southern Union Gas Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, Intervenors. Mojave Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Kern River Gas Transmission Company, United States Borax and Chemical Corporation, Southern California Gas Company, Mobil Oil Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Amoco Production Company, Southern Union Gas Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, the Southern California Utility Power Pool, the Process Gas Consumers Group, Intervenors. Kern River Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern California Gas Company, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Mojave Pipeline Company, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Amoco Production Company, Southern Union Gas Company, United States Borax and Chemical Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Southwest Gas Corporation, Southern California Utility Power Pool, Texaco, Inc., El Paso Natural Gas Company, Intervenors. Kern River Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Southern Union Gas Company, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern California Gas Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Utility Power Pool, Mojave Pipeline Company, Intervenors. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southwest Gas Corporation, Wyoming-California Pipeline Company, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Gas Company, Kern River Gas Transmission Company, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern Union Gas Company, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., New Mexico Department of Energy, Mineral & Natural Resources, the Process Gas Consumers Group, Mojave Pipeline Company, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 3, 1990No. 89-1396PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

900 F.2d 269

283 U.S.App.D.C. 285, 110 P.U.R.4th 555

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,

El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern California Gas

Company, Mobil Oil Corporation, Northwest Pipeline

Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Kern River Gas

Transmission Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company,

Texaco, Inc., et al., United States Borax and Chemical

Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Mojave Pipeline

Company, The Process Gas Consumers Group, Wyoming-California

Pipeline Company, Wyoming Natural Gas Pipeline…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Idaho Conservation League v. MummaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Sierra Club v. BabbittDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1999
  4. Committee of 100 on the Federal City v. FoxxDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. California Wholesale Electricity Antitrust Litigation Public Utility District No. 1 v. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API