Legal Opinion

Lovrenchich v. Collins

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1951No. 35,368PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

An appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover from defendant $1,033.02, the balance due on a charge of $2,091.73 as the reasonable value of services rendered in repairing certain mechanical equipment. Defendant contended that the material and workmanship furnished by plaintiff were unsatisfactory, and therefore the price charged was excessive. The trial court found that the reasonable value of the work was $1,794.73, of which $1,061.71 had been paid, and that plaintiff was entitled to judgment for the balance,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Edelstein v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Allen v. Central Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Ray v. Homewood Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Carroll v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Lacey v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Klingelhutz v. GroverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Sappa v. Strite-Anderson Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API