Legal Opinion

Klingelhutz v. Grover

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1975No. 45129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought a mechanics lien action for recovery of costs of construction of a home for defendants Donald C. Grover and Elaine W. Grover, husband and wife. On appeal, he challenges the amount allowed on his claim and the amount allowed for attorneys fees. We affirm.

On September 27, 1969, plaintiff and defendants Grover entered into a written contract in which plaintiff agreed to construct a house on their property in return for $35,297. On the night the contract was signed, plaintiff and defendants Grover examined certain detailed plans and the contract price was based on these plans.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Obraske v. WoodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Carroll v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. STANDARD CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Lovrenchich v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Asp v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Fudally v. Ching Johnson Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Sustainable 9, LLC d/b/a Sustainable 9 Design + Build v. Jacqueline Coleman, Riverland Bank, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API