Legal Opinion

Daggett v. Board of Public Utilities

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 16, 2011No. 104,835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

E. Leon Daggett appeals from the trial court’s ruling in favor of the Board of Public Utilities (BPU) on his breach of contract claim. On appeal, the BPU argues that this court does not *514have jurisdiction to hear this appeal because Daggett failed to timely file his appeal. We disagree. Daggett contends that the BPU breached the settlement agreement when it failed to ensure that Daggett received the benefit of its contributions to the pension plan. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to grant summary judgment in favor of Daggett for breach…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Malone v. University of Kansas Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. City of Topeka v. Watertower Place Development GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. City of Arkansas City v. BrutonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Dearborn Motors Credit Corporation v. NeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rand Construction Co. v. Dearborn Mid-West Conveyor Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
  2. Daggett v. Board of Public UtilitiesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. Harding v. Capitol Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API