Legal Opinion
City of Arkansas City v. Bruton
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided September 7, 2007No. 94,893PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
Ronald and Rebecca Bruton (the Brutons) own and reside upon a 5.4-acre plot of land that is located within the City of Arkansas City. Their property borders the Arkansas River and is subject to a 1935 easement granted to the City for flood protection. The City completed improvements to the existing dike on the Brutons’ property. This appeal on our grant of the City’s petition for review concerns the Brutons’ counterclaims for (1) a declaration of the rights under the 1935 easement and (2) inverse condemnation against the City from the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Simon v. National Farmers Organization, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Webb v. LungstrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Rhoten v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- National Bank of Andover v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Thoroughbred Associates, L.L.C. v. Kansas City Royalty Co., L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Levin v. MAW OIL & GAS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.