Legal Opinion

Harding v. Capitol Federal Savings Bank

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 4, 2024No. 126699Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 126,699 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS JENNIFER HARDING and SAMANTHA RAMIREZ, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. CAPITOL FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When evaluating whether a district court erred by granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, it presents an appellate court with a question of law subject to unlimited review. 2. When a district court has granted a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, an appellate court must accept the facts alleged by the plaintiff as true, along…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Waste Connections of Kansas, Inc. v. Ritchie Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Geer v. EbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. Campbell v. Husky Hogs, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. Cohen v. BattagliaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API