Legal Opinion
Rand Construction Co. v. Dearborn Mid-West Conveyor Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 6, 2013No. Case No. 11-2479-JTMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. THOMAS MARTEN, District Judge.
This case arises from an Air Force project for the construction of an automated coal-fueled power plant in Alaska. After installation of a new conveyor system was delayed, the Air Force assessed liquidated damages against the General Contractor. The parties to the present action are subordinate contractors who dispute among themselves where the ultimate responsibility for those damages, and the underlying failure of the conveyor system, should rest. All of the parties have submitted summary judgment motions, which are resolved as provided…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marso v. SafeSpeed, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Perdue v. Hy-Vee, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2020
- Pipeline Productions, Inc. v. The Madison Companies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Pipeline Productions, Inc. v. The Madison Companies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020