Legal Opinion

City of Topeka v. Watertower Place Development Group

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 29, 1998No. 78,862PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

The City of Topeka (City) and the Watertower Place Development Group (Watertower) entered into a contract giving Watertower exclusive rights to develop an area in the City. The City filed a declaratory action, claiming Watertower had breached the contract and, therefore, the City was no longer bound by the contract. Watertower filed a counterclaim for specific performance and monetary damages. The district court entered sum mary judgment for the City, finding the contract to be unambiguous and that the City had properly terminated the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Catholic Diocese of Dodge City v. RaymerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Stoldt v. City of TorontoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. United American State Bank v. Wild West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Gore v. BerenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. Brenner v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Blair Construction, Inc. v. McBethSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API