Legal Opinion
Tardiff v. Lynn Sand & Stone Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 28, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while in the employ of the defendant. The case was submitted to the jury on the fourth count of the declaration which alleged, in substance, that on June 29, 1929, the defendant carried on the business of quarrying and crushing stone, and the plaintiff was in its employ; that the defendant by the use of power drills bored holes in stones and ledges and blasted stones and ledges by exploding dynamite sticks inserted in the holes; that after each such explosion and blasting it was a part of the work of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Von Ette's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Cronan v. ArmitageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Farber v. Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Sweetland v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Chaves v. WeeksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hietala v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Enga v. SparksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Kendrick v. Lynn Sand & Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Boyd v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Lynn Sand & Stone Co. v. TardiffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.