Legal Opinion

Boyd v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 2, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff, who was hurt in an accident at Back Bay station, recovered a verdict in this action of tort. The defendant’s one exception is to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict.

Facts which the jury could have found are these. On Sunday, June 17, 1951, a holiday week end, the plaintiff and another man accompanied two girls to the Back Bay station, where the girls, but not the men, were to go to Bridgeport on a train of the defendant which was due to leave the South station at 11:05 p.m. E. S. T. and the Back Bay station at 11:10 p.m. E. S. T. After going to the ticket office,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Farber v. Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Railway Co. v. LawtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  3. Blanchette v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Renaud v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Morrow v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tsacoyeanes v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Penfield v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API