Legal Opinion

Hietala v. Boston & Albany Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 18, 1936PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is an action under the Federal employers’ liability act (Act of April 22, 1908, c. 149, 35 U. S. Sts. at Large, 65, U. S. C. Title 45, § 51 et seq.) for personal injuries sustained by an employee, engaged in interstate commerce, of an interstate common carrier by railroad.

The evidence tended to show the following facts. On August 24, 1929, the plaintiff was one of a gang of laborers engaged in removing the earth from between the ties of the defendant’s tracks at Pittsfield. He had been working *187there about twenty days. He knew that trains were running on the tracks. Having been directed…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Jamison v. EncarnacionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Riley v. DAVISON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Silver v. CushnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Gill v. Richmond Co-operative Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. McFadden v. Bancroft Hotel Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Gregory v. Maine Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API