Legal Opinion
Cronan v. Armitage
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 26, 1934PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort brought to recover compensation for personal injuries received on February 7, 1927, by the plaintiff in the course of his employment by the defendant. The case was submitted to the jury on three counts. Allegations common to all counts are that the plaintiff was employed as a helper or assistant to a journeyman electrician and received injuries through the negligence of his employer, an electrical contractor, who was not a subscriber under the workmen’s compensation act. The negligence of the defendant alleged in count one is that he knowingly put the plaintiff at…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bergeron v. ForestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Ryan v. Fall River Iron Works Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Minor v. SharonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Smith v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Cozzo v. Atlantic Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Hietala v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Engel v. Boston Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Partridge v. United Elastic Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.