Legal Opinion

Chaves v. Weeks

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 28, 1922PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate, Antone E. Chaves, was employed by the Union Street Railway Company. He was insured under the workmen’s compensation act by the Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. The action is brought by the Liberty Mutual Insurance Company under St. 1911, c. 751, as amended by St. 1913, c. 448 (see now G. L. c. 152, § 15), in the name of the administratrix of the estate of the employee, who has entered into an agreement with the insurance company for the payment of compensation in accordance with the workmen’s compensation act.

The first count in the declaration is to recover for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Cripps's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Turnquist v. HannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Hall v. Henry Thayer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. GontarzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. West v. Molders Foundry Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Furlong v. CronanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Becker v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Pemberton v. BoasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API