Chaves v. Weeks
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The plaintiff’s intestate, Antone E. Chaves, was employed by the Union Street Railway Company. He was insured under the workmen’s compensation act by the Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. The action is brought by the Liberty Mutual Insurance Company under St. 1911, c. 751, as amended by St. 1913, c. 448 (see now G. L. c. 152, § 15), in the name of the administratrix of the estate of the employee, who has entered into an agreement with the insurance company for the payment of compensation in accordance with the workmen’s compensation act.
The first count in the declaration is to recover for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Cripps's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Turnquist v. HannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Hall v. Henry Thayer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
3Cited by17 opinions
- Goldstein v. GontarzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- West v. Molders Foundry Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Furlong v. CronanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Becker v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Pemberton v. BoasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.