Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1974No. L.A. 30314PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Allen Dean Burnett seeks mandate to compel the respondent superior court to rule on petitioner’s motion to set aside an information (Pen. Code, § 995) charging petitioner with two violations of Penal Code section 211 (robbery). Petitioner contends that the respondent exceeded the power vested in it when, for the purpose of receiving further testimony, it declined to rule on the motion and remanded the cause to the municipal court wherein the magistrate had held petitioner to answer at the preliminary hearing (§ 872). We agree with petitioner’s contention and issue a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Sykes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Serrato v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Higgason v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Garcia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Currie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API