Legal Opinion

People v. Uhlemann

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1973No. Crim. 16326PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

It has long been the rule in this state that a magistrate’s dismissal of criminal charges following a preliminary examination does not bar the People from either refiling the same charges before another magistrate or seeking an indictment based upon those charges. (See Ex parte Fenton, 77 Cal. 183, 184 [19 P. 267]; People v. Prewitt, 52 Cal.2d 330, 340 [341 P.2d 1].) In this case, defendant urges us to adopt an exception to that long-standing rule in cases wherein the magistrate’s dismissal was based upon his factual finding that the defendant was innocent of all charges. As…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. PoseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. CarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API