Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 2009No. H033111PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McADAMS, J.

Petitioner Edgardo Garcia requests the issuance of a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order denying his motion to set aside count 3 of the information pursuant to Penal Code section 995, and to enter a new order dismissing count 3 of the information. The question presented is whether the trial court erred in granting the People’s request to reopen the preliminary hearing, pursuant to section 995a, subdivision (b)(1), for the purpose of permitting the court, sitting as a magistrate, to hear new evidence before ruling on defendant’s motion to set aside…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Alejandro Velazquez v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Miguel Rodriguez v. City of ModestoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Boarman v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  4. Mason v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Mundy v. Pro-Thro EnterprisesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API