Hara v. Montgomery County Joint Vocational School District
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The central issue in this case is whether the supplemental contract between Hara and the board was automatically renewed under former R.C. 3319.11 for a period of five years or for a period of one year from the time she received her continuing contract (1975).1 The court of appeals held that the initial automatic renewal of the supplemental contract (from the time Hara and the board entered into a continuing contract) was for a five-year term. The court of appeals also held that the supplemental contract was automatically renewed for a term of one year in each subsequent year until the board…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Stevens v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Meyers v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Tate v. Westerville City Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School District BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Bernhard v. Perrysburg TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Colaianni Constr., Inc. v. Ohio School Facilities Comm.Ohio Court of Claims · 2017
- Hara v. Montgomery Cty. Joint Vocational School Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996