Legal Opinion
Tate v. Westerville City Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1983No. 82-1406PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The issue presented is whether the automatic renewal provision of R.C. 3319.11 applies to supplemental teaching contracts. R.C. 3319.11 states in part:
“Any teacher employed under a limited contract, and not eligible to be considered for a continuing contract, is, at the expiration of such limited contract, deemed re-employed under the provisions of this section at the same salary plus any increment provided by the salary schedule unless the employing board * * * gives such teacher written notice of its intention not to reemploy him on or before the thirtieth day of April. * * *”
A board of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Peake v. Board of Education of the South Point Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hara v. Montgomery County Joint Vocational School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Dennis v. Board of Education of Hillsdale Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Kehoe v. Brunswick City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hara v. Montgomery Cty. Joint Vocational School Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Fraysier v. Bexley City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1989