Legal Opinion

Newman v. City of Okmulgee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1921No. 12190PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; John L. Norman, Judge. Action by Harvey Newman against the City of Okmulgee land others to enjoin the making of certain public improvements and the levy of special assessments. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Okmulgee county by plaintiff in error "against the city of Ok-mulgee et al. to enjoin defendants from proceeding with certain improvements and from levying a special assessment against the property of plaintiff to pay for said improvements. '

To the petition, the defendants filed a general demurrer, which was sustained by the court, and <*'om a judgment dismissing the petition the plaintiff has appealed. The only question involved is whether the petition stated facts sitfficient to constitute a cause of action. In determining this question…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pitser v. City of PawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bocox v. Town of BixbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Coleman v. StrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Perkins v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Myers v. PurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Yeaman v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API