Pitser v. City of Pawnee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pawnee County; L.-M. Poe, Judge. Action by G. W. Pitser against the City of Pawnee,'a corporation, and others. From an order dissolving a temporary injunction, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
Plaintiff in error seeks to reverse an order of the judge of the Twenty-first district in dissolving a tempox-ary injunction theretofore made. At the time of the hearing, neither party offered, any evidence, and the action of the judge is equivalent to holding that the petition does not state a cause of action. Both parties seem to have considered this case in this light, and in 'the oral argument it was presented on that theory, so we shall consider it in the same way.
The petition alleges, in substance, that defendants in error, who were defendants below, had entered into a contract with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Mason v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Ballard v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Flickinger v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edmonds v. Town of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Bocox v. Town of BixbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Newman v. City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Yeaman v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- City of Pauls Valley v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924