Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Strong

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 6, 1925No. 13802PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LYONS, C.

Tbe trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, and from tbis order tbe plaintiff appeals.

Tbe plaintiff alleges that tbe defendant in tbe action fraudulently induced tbe plaintiff, who was an ignorant, illiterate negro, to purchase a worthless mule,, said mule being sold with a warranty and being represented to be young, sound, and a first class mule. Plaintiff alleges that these representations were all false, that tbe mule was old, diseased, and practically worthless. The defendant thereupon induced the plaintiff to accept a- second mule which turned out to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Carter v. GrimmettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Nale v. HersteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Newman v. City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lusby v. T.G. & Y. Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Haffner v. First Nat. Bank of SeilingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Lusby v. Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API