Legal Opinion
Myers v. Purdy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 17, 1925No. 10980PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLESTEIt, J.
The plaintiff. Henry Myers, instituted this action in the district court of Creek county, on the 27th day of December, 3918, against A. H. Purdy, A. J. Combs, and the Roxana Petroleum Company, a corporation, defendants, to quiet title to 40 acres of land described in the plaintiff’s petition.
It was alleged, in substance, in the amended petition filed by the plaintiff, that Henry Myers, the plaintiff, is a citizen and member of the Creek Nation, enrolled as such opposite Roll No. E-4041, and that the land described in the petition was allotted and received by the plaintiff as his homestead…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Campbell v. McCahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Danciger v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Armstrong v. MiddlestadtNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Jackson v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- New York Baptist Union for Ministerial Education v. AtwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Collingsworth v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Claussen v. AmbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Chicago v. LoganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Barton v. Alpine Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Barton v. Alpine Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.