Legal Opinion

Carlson v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 24, 1980No. 414-782, CA 12647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

BUTTLER, J.

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

Plaintiffs seek review of the summary judgment entered for defendants in this suit for declaratory relief in which plaintiffs asked for a declaration that the union security and "fair share” provisions of the collective bargaining agreements between Local 189, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (the union) and the City of Portland (the city) are invalid. In addition to those declarations, the prayer is for injunctive relief and for repayment of all sums deducted from plaintiffs’ pay as "fair share” payments to the union.

Plaintiffs are or were employees of the city…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  2. Galda v. BlousteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  3. Carlson v. AFSCMECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API