Legal Opinion
Carlson v. AFSCME
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 22, 1985No. C-166-81; CA A31372PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
This case arose from an unfair labor practice complaint filed with the Employment Relations Board (ERB) under the Public Employe Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA), ORS 243.650 et seq. Respondents seek judicial review of ERB’s order which found that Metropolitan Employees Local 189 committed an unfair labor practice by spending a portion of complainants’ “fair-share” dues for unauthorized purposes.1 See ORS 243.650(16); 243.672(2)(a) and (c). Complainants, City of Portland employes who are not members of Local 189, cross-petition. They contend that ERB erred in holding that fair-share dues may…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. Children's Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carlson v. AFSCMECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985