Galda v. Bloustein
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Traditionally, First Amendment litigation has focused on the affirmative rights of individuals and groups to freedom of speech and association. In recent years, however, the increasing centralization of society has led to free speech concerns of a somewhat different nature — that individuals not be compelled to adhere to or support ideological positions espoused by powerful governmental or commercial organizations. See, e. g., First Nat’l Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765, 98 S.Ct. 1407, 55 L.Ed.2d 707 (1978); Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705, 97 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983
- Galda v. RutgersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Robinson v. State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- Galda v. BlousteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Galda v. RutgersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.