Coates v. Cotteral
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
In this action of ejectment, plaintiffs seek to recover possession of the property described in the writ, with mesne profits for its wrongful detention. As to the former, the court below gave binding instructions in their favor, but, as to the latter, left the jury to fix the damages for detention, if any, over and above the $500 paid by defendants, as hereinafter set forth. Judgment having been entered on the verdict, defendants appeal, and allege that binding instructions should not have been given, because “under all the evidence in the case, it [was] for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Black v. American International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Agnew v. Southern Avenue Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- O'Connell v. CeaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Ritter v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Hoover v. PontzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Delco Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Heights Land Co. v. Swengel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Harris v. DawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Alcorn Combustion Co. v. Kellogg Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- In Re Mount Holly Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.