Legal Opinion

Williams v. Beckmark

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1946No. 32006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an ejectment action. The defendant denied generally the allegations of the petition and alleged further, if the prayer of plaintiff’s petition. should be granted, that he was entitled to the benefit of the Occupying Claimants Act. The trial court entered an order ejecting the defendant from the premises and fixing the damages for the wrongful possession at $191.66. The trial court further found that defendant had placed lasting and valuable im*815provements on the premises and was entitled to the benefit and protection of the Occupying Claimants Act. The plaintiff appeals from that part…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kofka v. RosickyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Dale v. HunnemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ohme v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Horn v. StuckeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Sandoval v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. BeckmarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Carlson v. CarlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wlaschin v. AffleckNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API