Legal Opinion

Kurland v. Stolker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1987No. 135 E.D. Appeal Docket 1986PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice. *

This is the appeal of Leonard Stolker, individually and trading as Lombard Mews Co., a Partnership, and Philicent Corporation (Appellants) from the Per Curiam Order and Memorandum Opinion of the Superior Court, 344 Pa.Super. 632, 495 A.2d 619, affirming a final decree entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, directing Appellants to convey real estate to Edward N. Kurland, Esq., Executor of the Estate of Allen Cohen, Deceased, and Bernadine Cohen (Appellees), and awarding Appellees damages in the amount of $33,350.00. For the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hart v. CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Schuster v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Haskell v. HeathcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Brotman v. BrotmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Wright v. NultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Strausser v. PRAMCO, IIISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Zuk v. ZukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. M. Leff Radio Parts, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Firetree, Ltd. v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. EvansDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API