Legal Opinion
Hoch v. Byram
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 9, 1930No. 27,711PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.
Defendants as receivers were operating the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, when plaintiff, employed as fireman in the operation of an interstate freight train, was injured as hereinafter stated. The company was not a domestic corporation but owned and operated an extensive railway system in and through this and neighboring states. The accident took place shortly after noon October 16, 1927, in the airline yard of the company, at Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
• The train on which plaintiff then was fireman was just…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State ex rel. Bossung v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Erving v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Union Pacific Railroad v. RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Piche v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Southern Railway Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Fuhrman v. United America InsurorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Peterson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.