Legal Opinion
Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1930No. 27,700PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action in the district court of Rice county in the fifth judicial district to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff in Kansas while employed by the defendant railway company in interstate commerce. By stipulation the venue was changed to Steele county in the same district. The railway company moved that the action be dismissed upon the ground that a trial of it in Steele county would unreasonably burden interstate commerce and so violate the commerce clause of the constitution; and further it alleged that the ends of convenience would be served if the case were dismissed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Chubbuck v. HollowaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Gloeser v. Dollar Steamship Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Mattone v. ArgentinaOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Southern Railway Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.