Legal Opinion

Piche v. Halvorson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 23, 1937No. 31,193PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying Ms motion for new trial after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $9,000.

Plaintiff was injured on July U, 1935, in a collision between Ms automobile and that of defendant. Defendant admitted liability and litigated only the question of damages. Plaintiff, at the time of the accident, was 22 years of age, in good health, and of more than average intelligence. From 1930 to the time of the accident, he managed and operated his father’s farm of 320 acres, of which 55 acres were in pasture. He did most of the work, employing help only for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Baxter v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Peterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Hallum v. Village of OmroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Lestico v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API