Legal Opinion
Lang v. Barry
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 2, 1945No. Civ. 12711PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
At about 6:20 p. m. on the evening of October 14, 1941, Rudolph Lang, Jr., a sixteen-year-old minor employed part time as an attendant at the Signal Oil Station at the southeast corner of Fowler Avenue and Portola Drive in San Francisco, was called upon to repair the tire of an automobile which was then parked on the north side of Portola Drive a short distance west of the Signal station. Lang procured a portable jack and proceeded west along Portola Drive until he reached a point directly opposite the disabled automobile. He then proceeded north straight across Portola Drive at a point where…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Paxton v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Coombs v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Martter v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Isaacs v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.