Legal Opinion
Pete v. Youngblood
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided July 20, 2006No. 20050268-CAPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MeHUGH, Judge:
¶ 1 June W. Cox Pete appeals from summary judgment in favor of Dr. Robert L. Youngblood on Pete’s claim for medical malpractice based on Youngblood’s alleged failure to remove gauze from a surgical site. Pete also challenges the trial court’s refusal to allow her treating physician to testify as an expert witness when he was designated only as a fact witness during discovery and did not file an expert report under rule 26(a)(3) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. See Utah R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3). Finally, Pete claims that the trial court abused its discretion by denying her…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Perry Hamburger, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Hansen v. Central Iowa Hospital Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Dalley v. Utah Valley Regional Medical CenterUtah Supreme Court · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Drew v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Callister v. Snowbird CorporationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Ladd v. BOWERS TRUCKING, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- D.M. v. S.H.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.