Legal Opinion
Gilroy Canning Co. v. CALIFORNIA CANNERS AND GROW.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 21, 1998No. C 97-20035 PVTPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TRUMBULL, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties appeared before Magistrate Judge Trumbull at 10:00 a.m. on July 7, 1998 for hearing on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment. Based upon the arguments and briefs presented, the court DENIES Defendant’s motion.
I. Factual And Procedural Background
Gilroy Canning Company, Inc. (“GCC”) brings a sole cause of action against California Canners and Growers (“Cal Can”) under the Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) pursuant to RCRA §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Olin Corp. v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Harley-Davidson, Incorporated v. Minstar, Incorporated, and Amf IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Orange Environment, Inc. v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chico Service Station, Inc. v. Sol Puerto Rico Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Kara Holding Corp. v. Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Incorporated Village of Garden City v. Genesco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. Torlaw Realty, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- City of West Sacramento v. R & L Business ManagementDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.