Legal Opinion
Harley-Davidson, Incorporated v. Minstar, Incorporated, and Amf Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 28, 1994No. 94-2171PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
Harley-Davidson, the plaintiff in this CERCLA suit (the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq., commonly known as the Superfund statute), owns a manufacturing plant in York, Pennsylvania. Its predecessor had bought the plant from a predecessor of Minstar, Inc. and AMF Inc., related corporations that are the defendants-appellants. The buyer had agreed to indemnify the seller against all liabilities relating to the division of the seller (called the AMF York Division) that owned the plant. Later the land on which the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. LudwigSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Olin Corp. v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Brabham v. A.G. Edwards & Sons Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- North Shore Gas Company v. Salomon IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Taracorp, Inc. v. Nl Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Curtis-Universal, Inc. v. Sheboygan Emergency Medical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- ASARCO v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.