Legal Opinion

In Re Crow

California Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1971No. Crim. 13682PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

This case involves the application of the doctrine of res judicata to a final judgment of the superior court granting relief in habeas corpus. We shall explain why we have concluded that the judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County granting petitioner habeas corpus relief became a final judgment on the merits when the People failed to appeal under Penal Code section 1506. The merits of petitioner’s claim and the jurisdiction of the Sacramento court to grant relief in habeas corpus were fully and fairly litigated before that tribunal. We see no reason why the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In Re CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API