Hanley v. Walker
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, C. J.
The plaintiffs composed the firm of George Hanley & Bro., who were house plasterers doing business in the city of Detroit. In 1886, defendant was building brick dwelling-houses situated upon John R. and Watson streets, in the city of Detroit. They were five in number. On May 26, 1886, the plaintiffs entered into a contract with defendant to do the plastering in these houses according to certain plans and specifications then prepared for said work by William Scott & Co., architects, which plans and specifications were made a part of the contract. The plaintiffs were to furnish and provide *609all…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Boettler v. TendickTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Allen v. McKibbinMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Tyler v. AmesNew York Supreme Court · 1872
- Wildey v. Fractional School District Number OneMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Duval County v. Charleston Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Wortman v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1892
- McGlauflin v. WormserMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Southern Manufacturing Co. v. R. L. Moss Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Schmidt v. City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1895
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.