Legal Opinion
Federal Express Corp. v. United States Postal Service
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided November 22, 1999No. 96-3151 D/APublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the court are two motions to dismiss the plaintiffs, Federal Express Corporation (hereinafter “FedEx”), first amended complaint, one filed by the defendants, Foote, Cone & Belding (apparently incorrectly sued as FCB/Leber Katz Partners, Inc., hereinafter “FCB”) and FCB’s parent, True North Communications, Inc. (hereinafter “True North”), and the other filed by the defendant, Young & Rubicam, Inc. (hereinafter “Y & R”), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The grounds raised by the defendants…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Island Insteel Systems, Inc. v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Fulmore v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Johnny's Fine Foods, Inc. v. Johnny's Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Starks-Umoja v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Island Insteel Systems, Inc. v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.